The levelling of administrative systems in pre-colonial Africa would be to see them as systems that propagated the promotion of common good to the community. This has tempted some scholars in the recent years to meditate and gear towards the thinking of native administrative systems. The argument is that Africans had well premised themselves for self-governance before colonialism and its legacy on the continent, Pratt (1965). However, the Eurocentric scholarship authenticity propagates for modernity to be a elixir for Africa`s development. Some scholars such as Ekeh (1975), Riggs (1964) present Africa to be having dual systems in the post independence era. They count this duality as inefficiency for Africa should embrace and romance with modern administrative values and hence, they see the attachment of these systems to be a curse. They argue that, the two systems of administration cannot marry and when they marry the inefficiencies such as corruption, partiality result, Riggs (1964). The post independence administration worked behind the established constitutions (Westminster and Gaullist) by the former colonial masters that are Britain and France respectively. The administrative systems of indigenous and that of colonialism if are compatible, why then has Africa not developed institutions of governance to accommodate such compatibilities? If they are incompatible, what is the way out towards a harmonized system of administration in Africa? The central argument in this paper is that while scholars such as Ekeh 1975 and Riggs find the two systems to create problems for Africa`s administration, I argue that the hybrid system would create strong institutions as its a sine qua non condition for administration development. The quandary of administration in Africa is not due to the compatible model but rather a Western modernist view that Africa`s public administration has not applied in totus the western values which this paper criticises as a myopic outlook. African public administration by its virtue of reform post independence to Africanize and compatibilize some of the already existing and new administration principles is symbolically strength towards administration development.
The litmus test is done to see if post independence public administration attempted to amalgamate indigenous administrative values with modern administration values. If the post independence theory and practice reflect the amalgamation, then it will be put that there is congruency and vice versa. Hence, this paper argues that administration should be reflecting the people’s culture, norms and taboos for the administration development to be realized.
indigenous, administration, public administration, post-independence
Aristotle, Nichomachean Ethics (2004),ed. Hugh Treddenick, London: Penguin. The main source for Aristotle’s ethics.
B.G. Peters (4th ed.) The Politics of Bureaucracy, Longman, 1995.
Bardhan, P. (2002). Decentralization of Governance and Development. Journal of Economic perspectives, Vol. 16 (4): 185-205.
Bond, G.C. (1976). The politics of Change in a Zambian Community. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Boone, Catherine, (2003). Political Topographies of the African State: Territorial Authority and Institu-tional Choice, Cambridge University Press.
Busia, K.A. (1951). The position of the chief in the modern political system of Ashanti. London: OUP.
Chazan, N., Mortimer, R., Ravenhill, J., Rothchild, D. (Eds.) (1992). Politics and Society in Contemporary Africa. 2nd ed., Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, p. 7.
Collins, R. (1985). Sociology of Marriage and the Family: Gender, Love and property. Chicago, Ill: Nelson-Hall, Inc.
Davidson, B. (1992). The Black Man’s Burden: Africa and the Curse of the Nation-State. New York: Times Books.
Drah, F.K. (1979). The Brong political movement. In Arhin, K. (ed.). A Profile of Brong Akyempin. Accra:Afram Publishers.
Ekeh, Peter (1975) Colonialism and the Two Publics in Africa: A Theoretical Statement, Comparative Studies in Society and History, Vol. 17, No. 1. (Jan., 1975), pp. 91-112.
Englebert, P. (2000). Solving the Mystery of the Africa Dummy. World development, 28(10):1821–1835.
Esman MJ (1974) Administrative doctrine and developmental needs. In: Morgan EP (ed.).
Hyden, G and Michael B (Eds) (1992). Governance and Politics in Africa.Lynne Rienner Publishers, Boulder.
Keulder, C. 1998. Traditional Leaders and Local Government in Africa: Lessons for South Africa. Pretoria: Human Sciences Research Council.
Low, D.A., 1965, “Uganda: The Establishment of the Protectorate, 1894-1919”, in Vincent Harlow and E.M. Chilver, History of East Africa, vol. II, Oxford University Press.
Mair, Lucy (1962), Primitive Government, Penguin Books, Baltimore, Maryland.
Mamdani, Mahmood, 1996, Citizen and Subject: Contemporary Africa and the Legacy of Late Colonialism, Nationalism, Princeton University Press.
Manor, J. (1995) ‘Democratic Decentralization in Africa’, IDS Bulletin Vol. 26 April.
Mkandawire, T. (1995), Beyond Crisis: ‘Towards Democratic Developmental States in Africa’. Paper presented to the CODESRIA 8th General Assembly.
Mukandala, R. (2001) African Public Administration in Africa : A Reader African Association for Public Administration and Management, Harare.
Mutahaba, G (1986). Ecology and Public Administration in Africa: A review of their Relationships Since Independence.” In African Association for Public Administration and Management, The Ecology of Public Administration and Management in Africa. New Dehli, Vikas Publishing Press.
Njoh, A.J. (2006) Tradition, culture and Development in Africa: Historical lessons for modern, Ashgate Publishing ltd.
Olowu,B (1999). “Redesigning African Civil Service Reforms,” Journal of Modern African Studies 37(1).
Pratt, R.C., (1965), “Administration and Politics in Uganda, 1919–1945”, in Vincent Harlow and E.M. Chilver, History of East Africa, vol. II, Oxford University Press. presented to the European Association of Development Policy Institute Congress, Amsterdam. Recovery and Development. West Hartford, Kumarian Press.
Richards, Audrey I. (ed.), 1960, East African Chiefs: A Study of Political Development in Some Uganda and Tanganyika Tribes, London.
Riggs FW (1964) Administration of Developing Countries. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Riggs FW (1991) Public administration: A comparative framework. Public Administration.
Schapera, Isaac, 1970, Tribal Innovators: Tswana Chiefs and Social Change, 1795–1940, London.The Administration of Change in Africa. New York: Dunellen, 3–26.