The article presents an analytical review of approaches to the emergence of African protest identity. It examines the causes and forms of protest identity in Africa, both historically and in the present. The African protest identity is associated with colonial cultural pressure and constitutes a reaction to the discrediting of African culture and the personality of an African. Two opposing approaches to colonization are highlighted in the research. The Eurocentric approach considers colonization to be a beneficial, civilizing project, whereas Africans themselves see it as a tragedy that led to an identity crisis and the construction of new forms of identity (E. Blyden, “The Negritude” by L.S. Senghor).
The African protest identity was formed in opposition to the white man’s culture and the white race as a whole. The mechanism of its formation includes the creation of new binary oppositions, the change of evaluation poles, and placing an emphasis on the uniqueness and superiority of African culture and the African man. Historical analysis and the method of comparative analysis are used in the research to identify differences and taboo areas in intercultural interaction. It is concluded that African protest identity, in most of its manifestations, is anti-colonial, anti-globalist, racial, and civilizational in nature. The processes of formation of “anti-neocolonial” African protest identity can intensify and take the form of aspirations for sovereignty, subjectivity, for the search for one’s own way. This requires a separate study, which the author has already begun. This article can be considered a continuation of the author’s previously published material, “Value-semantic blocks in the images of African poetry (in the context of historical and social changes).”
1. Ageev V.S. (1990). Intergroup Interaction: Socio-psychological Problems. Moscow: Moscow University Press. (In Russ.)
2. Belinskaya E.P., Stefanenko T.G. (2000). Ethnic Socialization of a Teenager. Moscow: Publishing House of the Moscow Psychological and Social Institute. (In Russ.)
3. Davidson A., Mazov S. (2007). African History in Documents. 1870–2000. Vol. 2, 1919–1960. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
4. Eisenstadt S.N. (1955). The Absorption of Immigrants: A Comparative Study Based Mainly on the Jewish Community in Palestine and the State of Israel. Glencoe: The Free Press.
5. Eisenstadt S.N. (2010). Contemporary Globalization and New Civilizational Formations. Journal of Globalization Studies. Vol. 1. № 2. Pp. 3–11.
6. Erikson E. (1968). Identity: Youth and Crisis. New York: W.W. Norton.
7. Fedotova N.N. (2013). The Conceptions of Identity in the Context of Nonlinear Sociocultural Dynamics. Knowledge. Understanding. Skill. № 2. Рp. 52–62. (In Russ.)
8. Gavristova T.M. (2022). Migritude as a Presentation of Identity. In: Krylova N.L., Ksenofontova N.A. (Eds.). The Gender Aspect of African Culture: Between Archaic and Modernity. Moscow: Institute for African Studies. Рp. 194–202. (In Russ.)
9. Goffman E. (1986). Stigma: Notes on the Management of Spoiled Identity. New York: Touchstone Books.
10. Hofstede G. (2011). Dimensionalizing Cultures: The Hofstede Model in Context. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture. Vol. 2. № 1. https://doi.org/10.9707/2307-0919.1014
11. Ka Isaka Seme P. (1906). The Regeneration of Africa. African Affairs. Vol. 5. № XX. Pp. 404–408. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.afraf.a094874
12. Kharitonova E.V. (2019). «Protesting Man» in an Era of Global Change (Based on the Case of the countries of the African Continent and the Migration Crisis in Europe). XIX International Likhachov Scientific Conference. (In Russ.). https://lihachev.ru/pic/site/files/lihcht/2019/dokladi/HaritonovaEV _sec2_rus_040519.pdf (accessed: 29.04.2024).
13. Kharitonova E.V. (2023). Traditional African Values and Ethics in the Mirror of Business Communications, or Why the Western Model of Capitalism Does not Take Root in Africa. XXI International Likhachov Scientific Conference. (In Russ.). https://www.lihachev.ru/chten/2023/sec2/ Kharitonova_EV_Traditsionnie_Afrikanskie_tsennosti_i_etika_2606.pdf (accessed: 29.04.2024).
14. Khokholkova N.E. (2019). Afrocentrism in the USA: theory and practice of socio-cultural transformations. Moscow: Institute for African Studies of the Russian Academy of Sciences Publishing House. (In Russ.)
15. Lurie S.V. (2004). Historical Ethnology. Moscow: Gaudeamus. (In Russ.)
16. Malinovski B. (1997). Scientific Principles and Methods for Studying Cultural Change. In: Mostova L.A. (Ed.). Anthology of cultural studies. Vol.1. Saint Petersburg: University Book. Рp. 373–384. (In Russ.)
17. Mannoni O. (1956). Prospero and Caliban. The Psychology of Colonisation. London: Methuen et Co.
18. Moseyko A.N. (2018). Leopold Cedar Senghor: a philosopher and theorist of African art. In: Elez A.Y. (Ed.). Senegal yesterday and today. Moscow: Institute for African Studies. Рp. 15–29. (In Russ.)
19. Moseyko A.N. (2023). Value-Ethical System in Sub-Saharan Africa. From the Past to the Future. Journal of the Institute for African Studies. № 3. Рp. 110–124. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2023-64-3-110-124
20. Odoyuye M.A. (1979). The Value of African Religious Beliefs and Practices for Christian Theology. In: Appiah-Kubi K., Torres S. (Eds.). Theology on Route. Maryknoll, New-York: Orbis Books. Рp. 103–110.
21. Pines E., Maslach K. (2001). Workshop on Social Psychology. Saint Petersburg: Piter. (In Russ.)
22. Porshnev B.F. (1979). Social Psychology and History. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
23. Redfield R., Linton R., Herskovits M.J. (1936). Memorandum for the Study of Acculturation. American Anthropologist. Vol. 38. № 1. Pp. 149–152. https://doi.org/10.1525/aa.1936.38.1.02a00330
24. Said E.W. (1978). Orientalism. New York: Pantheon Books.
25. Said E.W. (1994). Culture and Imperialism. London: Random House.
26. Senghor L.S. (1964). Liberte. Negritude et humanisme. Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
27. Senghor L.S. (1962). De la Negritude. Psychologie du Negro-africain. Diogene. № 37. Pp. 1–15.
28. Smelser N.J. (2003). On Comparative Analysis, Interdisciplinarity and Internationalization in Sociology. International Sociology. Vol. 18. № 4. Pp. 634–657. https://doi.org/10.1177/0268580903184001
29. Weber M. (2009). The Protestant Ethics and the Spirit of Capitalism. New York: W.W. Norton and Company.
30. Zalewski I. (2022). Alfred Schütz Revisited: Social Exclusion of Refugees in Brandenburg. Qualitative Sociology Review. Vol. 18. № 2. Рp. 72–88. https://doi.org/10.18778/1733-8077.18.2.04
31. Zhade Z.A., Ujuhu S.M. (2011). The Phenomenon of Protest Identity in Modern Russian Society. Bulletin of the Adygea State University. Series: Regional studies: philosophy, history, sociology, jurisprudence, political science, cultural studies. № 4. Рp. 249–255. (In Russ.)
For citation:
Kharitonova E.V. On the Question of African “Protest Identity”. Journal of the Institute for African Studies. 2024. № 3. Pp. 64–79. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2024-68-3-64-79
Для цитирования:
Харитонова Е.В. К вопросу об африканской «протестной идентичности». Ученые записки Института Африки РАН. 2024. № 3. С. 64–79. https://doi. org/10.31132/2412-5717-2024-68-3-64-79
