Beyond Yields: Structural Factors Behind The Green Revolution’s Limited Impact in Africa

Author:

L. Kayongo

Abstract:

The Green Revolution in Africa has been mainly driven by international agencies such as the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO), the Yara Foundation, and the International Fund for Agricultural Development (IFAD). Despite the billions of dollars invested the success of the movement in Africa has been limited. This paper critically examines why the Green Revolution model promoted by the Alliance for the Green Revolution in Africa (AGRA) has had limited impact in Africa, arguing that the movement’s reliance on increased crop yields as a solution for poverty and hunger is overly simplistic and overlooks local conditions in Africa that make difficult for the Green Revolution to duplicate the successes of the Green Revolution in Asia and Latin America. It advocates for a paradigm shift toward ecologically sustainable and locally driven agricultural reforms that prioritize smallholder farmers and protects Africa’s food sovereignty. The paper uses historical analysis to critique the adverse ecological, social, and economic consequences of borrowed, externally driven agricultural models that overlook the unique challenges of African farming systems, such as low irrigation potential, dependence on mono-cultures, and inadequate attention to local diets and practices. It highlights the disproportionate benefits that the green revolution in Africa is accruing to medium-scale male farmers, while increasing gendered inequalities in food production and distribution.

Keywords:

green revolution, food security, structural poverty, AGRA, Africa, food sovereignty

DOI:

10.31132/2412-5717-2025-72-3-79-89

References:

1. Asiema J. (1994). Africa’s Green Revolution. Biotechnology and Development Monitor. № 19. Pp. 17–18.
2. Bationo A., Waswa B., Okeyo J. M., Maina F., Kihara J.M. (Eds.). (2011). Innovations as key to the Green Revolution in Africa. Vol. 1. Exploring the Scientific Facts. Dordrecht: Springer.
3. Bazuin S., Azadi H., Witlox F. (2011). Application of GM crops in Sub-Saharan Africa: Lessons learned from Green Revolution. Biotechnology Advances. Vol. 29. № 6. Pp. 908–912. https://doi.org/10.1016/ j.biotechadv.2011.07.011
4. Conway G. (1997). The Doubly Green Revolution: Food for All in the Twenty-First Century. London: Penguin Books.
5. Daño E.C. (2007). Unmasking the New Green Revolution in Africa: Motives, Players and Dynamics. Penang: Third World Network.
6. Dawson N., Martin A., Sikor T. (2016). Green Revolution in Sub-Saharan Africa: Implications of Imposed Innovation for the Wellbeing of Rural Smallholders. World Development. Vol. 78. № 2. Pp. 204–218. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2015.10.008
7. Djurfeldt G., Holmén H., Jirström M., Larsson R. (Eds.). (2005). The African Food Crisis: Lessons from the Asian Green Revolution. Wallingford: CABI Publishers.

For citation:

Kayongo L. (2025). Beyond Yields: Structural Factors Behind the Green Revolution’s Limited Impact in Africa. Journal of the Institute for African Studies. Vol. 11. № 3. Pp. 79‒89. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2025-72-3-79-89

Для цитирования:

Кайонго Л. Не урожайностью единой. Структурные ограничения «зеленой революции» в Африке. Ученые записки Института Африки РАН. 2025. Т. 11. № 3. С. 79‒89. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2025-72-3-79-89