Nigeria’s Hegemonic Status in Africa: Factors, Discourse and Prospects

Author:

Erameh N.I., Ologe U.H., Ojakorotu V.

Abstract:

The debate surrounding the hegemonic status of powerful African nations provides the context for this study, which re-evaluates Nigeria’s hegemonic status. Nigeria’s evolution from traditional humanitarian intervention to aligning with the Responsibility to Protect (R2P) doctrine suggests a willingness to act as a stabilizing force in an unstable region.

This role is a pressing regional concern and a matter of global interest. Essentially, the consolidation of a legitimate African hegemon could address regional instability and release substantial international humanitarian resources dedicated to the continent.

The debate between proponents and opponents of Nigeria’s hegemony hinges on its historic commitment to peacekeeping and mounting domestic challenges. Using the Hegemonic Stability Theory (HST), this reviews the arguments around Nigeria’s hegemonic status. It draws on qualitative data from secondary sources and primary data from in-depth interviews with key informants from specialized agencies.

The findings show that Nigeria’s commitment to regional stability through peacekeeping stems from its Afrocentric foreign policy and self-imposed sense of ‘manifest destiny’, but these efforts alone do not confirm hegemonic status. While Nigeria exhibits a measure of normative leadership expected of a hegemon, domestic pressures undermine its capacity to fully embody the role of a hegemon.

The study concludes that Nigeria performs a ‘quasi-hegemonic’ function that has contributed to relative stability especially in West Africa. However, diminishing domestic capacities required for sustained regional leadership presents a significant constraint on Nigeria’s transformation into an effective African hegemon with critical implications for regional stability and international humanitarian financing.

Keywords:

Nigeria, hegemony, humanitarian intervention, R2P, peacekeeping, Afrocentric foreign policy

DOI:

10.31132/2412-5717-2025-73-4-65-82

References:

1. Adebajo A. Pax Nigeriana Versus Pax Gallica: ECOWAS and UN Peacekeeping in Mali. In: Karbo T., Virk K. (Eds.). The Palgrave Handbook of Peacebuilding in Africa. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan, 2018. Pp. 209–231. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-62202-6_12
2. Adebajo A., Landsberg C. Nigeria and South Africa as Regional Hegemons. In: Baregu M., Landsberg C. (Eds.). From Cape to Congo: Southern Africa’s Evolving Emerging Security Challenges. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers, 2003. Pp. 171–203.
3. Adebajo A., Mustapha A.R. (Eds). Gulliver’s troubles: Nigeria’s foreign policy after the Cold War. Pietermaritzburg: University of KwaZulu-Natal Press, 2008.
4. Adeleke T. Africa and Afrocentric Historicism: A Critique. Advances in Historical Studies. 2015. Vol. 4. № 3. Pp. 200–215. https://doi.org/10.4236/ahs.2015.43016
5. Adigbuo E.R. Contemporary International System, Aligning Technology with Nigeria’s Foreign Policy. OCHENDO: An African Journal of Innovative Studies. 2022. Vol. 3. № 1. Pp. 165–183.
6. Ake C. A Political Economy of Africa. Washington D.C.: Brookings Institution, 1996.
7. Akinterinwa B.A. An Overview of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy, 1960–2010: Challenges and Recommendations. In: Anyaoku E. (Ed.). Review of Nigeria’s Foreign Policy: Issues and Perspectives. Lagos: Nigeria Institute of International Affairs, 2012. Pp. 17–27.

For citation:

Erameh N.I., Ologe U.H., Ojakorotu V. (2025). Reassessing Nigeria’s Hegemonic Status in Africa: Factors, Discourse and Prospects. Journal of the Institute for African Studies. Vol. 11. № 4. Pp. 65–82. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2025-73-4-65-82

Для цитирования:

Эраме Н.И., Олодже У.Х., Оджакороту В. Переоценка гегемонистского статуса Нигерии в Африке: факторы, дискурс, перспективы. Ученые записки Института Африки РАН. 2025. Т. 11. № 4. С. 65–82. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2025-73-4-65-82