Difference of Approaches to the Concept of Equality: Western Tradition and L.S. Senghor
Author:
Ponomarev I.V., Tutorsky A.V.
Abstract:
In this paper, the authors present a comparative perspective of the notion of equality in the Western school of scientific thought—a notion that became the cornerstone for specific scientific concepts in Western social and political philosophy—and the non-Western approaches to equality, taking as an example of the latter the ideas of the Senegal politician and philosopher L.S. Senghor. Such a comparison is of interest because the African thinker, although he had studied in France and enjoyed political recognition there, understood the concept of equality in postcolonial context quite differently from the Western philosophers. Other African postcolonial political figures (e.g., J. Nyerere) have also addressed the equality concept, but it is Senghor’s ideas that demonstrate so openly the African alternative to the Western approach. Senghor’s concept of equality is inseparable from his postcolonial political activities: during this period of his life, he introduced a notion of Civilisation de l’Universel, Civilization of the Universal, which was based on this concept. According to Senghor, such a civilization should evolve through the use of dialogue on equal terms, integrating the values of different civilizations of the West and East. He juxtaposed this notion with the one of civilisation universelle, Universal Civilization, the evolution of which is based exclusively on Euro-American values and can, in its technocrat rush, distort human nature, leading to the demise of humankind. Trying to resolve the dichotomies of Eurocentric approach, born of the gap between rational and intuitive thinking, Senghor adopts a concept of equality as unity, which brings him close to the Eastern Christian tradition of interpreting equality. It is in sharp contrast to Euro-American social tradition, which focuses solely on rational and ideological conceptualizing.
1. Anderson E. (2014). The fundamental disagreement between luck egalitarians and relational egalitarians. Canadian Journal of Philosophy. Vol. 40. Pp. 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/00455091.2010.10717652
2. Aristotle. (1893). The Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trübner and Co.
3. Aristotle. (1895). Aristotle’s Politics: A Treatise on Government. London: Routledge and Sons.
4. Aristotle. (1915). Magna Moralia. In: Ross W.D. (Ed.). The Works of Aristotle. Oxford: Clarendon Press. Pp. 1181–1230.
5. Arneson R. (1989). Equality and Equal Opportunity for Welfare. Philosophical Studies. Vol. 1. № 56. Pp. 77–93.
6. Chesterton G.K. (1909). Orthodoxy. London: John Lane.
7. Cohen G.A. (1989). On the Currency of Egalitarian Justice. Ethics. Vol. 4. № 99. Pp. 906–944.
8. Dürrenmatt F. (2010). Correlations. Essay about Israel. Moscow: Knizhniki. (In Russ.)
9. Dworkin R. (2002). Sovereign Virtue: The Theory and Practice of Equality. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
10. Erasov B.S. (1972). Tropical Africa: Ideology and Problems of Culture. Moscow: Nauka. (In Russ.)
11. Eusebius. (1926). The Ecclesiastical History. London: William Heinemann.
12. Frankfurt H. (1987). Equality as a Moral Ideal. Ethics. Vol. 98. № 1. Pp. 21–43.
13. Hegel G.W.F. (2019). The Collected Works of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel. Delphi Classics.
14. Kharitonova E.V. (2024). Value-Semantic Blocks in Images of African Poetry (in the Context of Historical and Social Changes). Journal of the Institute for African Studies. № 1. Pp. 127–144. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2024-66-1-127-144
15. Kozyrev F.N. (2015). Equality and Freedom: Christian Values? Review of Russian Christian Academy for the Humanities. Vol. 16. № 3. Pp. 122–136. (In Russ.)
16. Lamola M.J. (2016). Senghor, globalism and Africanity. Phronimon. Vol. 17. № 2. Pp. 51–67. http://doi.org/10. 17159/2413-3086/2016/1967
17. Lotman U.М. (1967). Rousseau and Russian Culture of XVIII. In: Alexeev М.P. (Ed.). Epoch of Enlightenment. Leningrad: Nauka. Pp. 208–281. (In Russ.)
18. Lyakhovskaya N.D. (1995). Léopold Sédar Senghor. Moscow: Nasledie. (In Russ.)
19. Mabana K.C. (2012). Léopold Sédar Senghor et la civilisation de l’universel. Diogène. Vol. 3/4. № 235–236. Pp. 3–13.
20. Mitina N.G. (2019). G. Babeuf’s society of universal equality. Context and Reflection: Philosophy of the World and Human Being. Vol. 8. № 2. Pp. 166–172. (In Russ.)
21. Moseiko A.I. (2018). Leopold Sedar Senghor, the philosopher and theorist of African art. In: Elez A.Y. (Ed.). Senegal yesterday and today. Moscow: Institute for African Studies. Pp. 15–29. (In Russ.)
22. Naidenova N.S. (2017). The concept of Negritude in the modern fiction in French and Spanish: past and present. Oriens. №5. Pp. 106–116. (In Russ.). https://doi.org/10.7868/S0869190817050090
23. Parfit D. (2000). Equality or priority? In: Clayton M., Williams A. (Eds.) The Ideal of Equality. Basingstoke: Macmillan. Pp. 81–125.
24. Rawls J. (1971). A Theory of Justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
25. Robbins J. (1994). Equality as a Value: Ideology in Dumont, Melanesia and the West. Social Analysis. Vol. 1. № 36. Pp. 21–70.
26. Rousseau J.-J. (1923). A Discourse on a Subject Proposed by the Academy of Dijon: What is the Origin of Inequality Among Men, and Is It Authorised by Natural Law? In: Rousseau J.-J. The Social Contract and Discourses. London: J.M. Dent and Sons.
27. Senghor L.S. (1961a). Allocution du président de la République du Sénégal à la XVIᵉ session de l’assemlée générale des Nation Unies tenues le 31 Octobre 1961. L’Afrique à l’O.N.U. Paris: Présence africaine.
28. Senghor L.S. (1961b). Nation et voie Africaine du Socialism. Paris: Présence africaine.
29. Senghor L.S. (1962). Message de paix adressé au monde. Firenze: TG.
30. Senghor L.S. (1963). Planification et tension morale. IVᵉ Congrès national de l’Union Progressiste Sénégalaise, les 10–12 Octobre 1963. Dakar: MIT.
31. Senghor L.S. (1964a). Liberté 1. Négritude et humanism. Paris: Édition du Seuil.
32. Senghor L.S. (1964b). Voyage officiel aux Étas-Unis du Brésil de S. Exc. M. Léopold Sédar Senghor, Président de la République du Sénégal. Dakar: CIRT.
33. Senghor L.S. (1967). Les fondements de l’Africanité ou négritude et arabité. Paris: Présence africaine.
34. Senghor L.S. (1969). Négritude, arabité et francité. Réflexions sur le problém de la culture. Beyrouth: DKA.
35. Senghor L.S. (1971a). Liberté 2: Nation et voie africaine du socialism. Paris: Édition du Seuil.
36. Senghor L.S. (1971b). Senghor à Bruxelles. La négritude est un humanisme du XXᵉ siècle. Dakar: GIA.
37. Senghor L.S. (1975). Paroles. Dakar-Abidjan: LNEA.
38. Senghor L.S. (1983). Liberté 4. Socialism et planification. Paris: Édition du Seuil.
39. Sogrin V.V. (2021). The Stages and Vicissitudes of American Equality. In: Sogrin V.V. (ed.). American Yearbook. Moscow: Ves’ Mir. Pp. 92–125. (In Russ.)
40. Stoeckli А.E. (1984). ‘Utopia’ and notions of equality in antiquity. In: Rutenburg V.I. (Ed.). Heritage of Antiquity in the Culture of Renaissance. Moscow: Nauka. Pp. 89–98. (In Russ.)
41. Theophan the Recluse. (2006). Exegesis on the First Epistle of St Paul to the Corinthians. Moscow: Pravilo Very. (In Russ.)
42. Tutorskiy A.V. (2020). “The knife or the haft”: realizing equality of outcomes in hunting practices (preliminary field report). Prehistoric Archaeology Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies. № 1. Pp. 92–101. https://doi.org/10.31600/2658-3925-2020-1-92-101
43. Tutorski A. (2022). Equality, Individualism, Holism: Perspectives of ‘Dumontian’ Anthropology. History HSE. №. 1. Pp. 61–81. (In Russ.)
44. Walker H. (2020). Equality without equivalence: an anthropology of the common. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute. Vol. 26. № 1. Pp. 146–166. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9655.13183
45. Walzer M. (1970). The Revolution of the Saints: A Study in the Origins of Radical Politics. New York: Athenium.
46. Zastenker N.E. (1985). Essay on History of Socialistic Thought. Moscow: Mysl. (In Russ.)
For citation:
Ponomarev I.V., Tutorsky A.V. Difference of Approaches to the Concept of Equality: Western Tradition and L.S. Senghor. Journal of the Institute for African Studies. 2024. № 4. Pp. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2024-69-4-61-73
Для цитирования:
Пономарев И.В., Туторский А.В. Различие подходов к концепту «равенство»: западная традиция и Л.С. Сенгор. Ученые записки Института Африки РАН. 2024. № 4. С. 61–73. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2024-69-4-61-73
