The RSA’s Opposition Parties’ Approaches to Solving the Energy Crisis: a Viable Alternative to the ANC?
Author:
Nesterova E.S.
Abstract:
The energy crisis in South Africa became a byword within the South African society, having transformed into a critical factor in the political infighting. The shortage of generating capacity, the lack of qualified personnel, the widespread corruption and other challenges have significantly undermined the energy sector. It has contributed to the mood of protest in the population. These protest sentiments among the public resulted in their voting for opposition parties promising to find a way out of the energy crisis by a range of the South African citizens. The paper considers the ideas of the most popular South African opposition parties in the context of the resolution of the long-standing energy crisis. One of the main materials for analysing the parties’ approaches to resolving the energy crisis was their 2024 manifestos. Since it was the parties’ pre-election views on the energy crisis that were examined, all of them are called in this text as “opposition” regardless of whether they joined the Government of National Unity/GNU after the elections.
The views of the South African opposition parties, including those, which entered into the Government of National Unity (GNU) following the 2024 elections, on the pathways out of the energy crisis are often utopian and radical. Thus, they can potentially lead to unpredictable consequences. In particular, the privatisation of the energy sector advocated by some parties poses the risk of the nuclear power plant, controlled by the state-owned company Eskom, being transferred to private companies. It, in turn, implicates the loss of the state control over a highly sensitive economic sector that requires significant, unprofitable investments in the safe storage and disposal of radioactive wastes. The opposition’s emphasis on renewable energy sources is detrimental due to its underestimation of the domestic fossil fuels’ use; it is fraught with overexpenditure, inefficient redistribution, as well as lack of attention to the detrimental effect of certain types of green energy on both the environment and human health.
Keywords:
energy crisis, South Africa, green agenda, coal-fired power generation, nuclear energy, political parties, opposition
DOI:
10.31132/2412-5717-2025-73-4-138-155
References:
1. Игнатов А.А. Проблемы и перспективы реализации политики справедливого энергетического перехода в ЮАР. Вестник международных организаций. 2023. Т. 18. № 4. С. 124–146. https://doi.org/ 10.17323/1996-7845-2023-04-05 2. Скубко Ю.С. «ЭСКОМ» и проблемы южноафриканской энергетики. Ученые записки Института Африки РАН. 2023. № 4 (65). С. 31–43. 3. Туряница Д.А. Патрисия де Лилль: победы и просчеты в карьере «цветного» политика ЮАР. Азия и Африка сегодня. 2020. № 8. С. 69–74. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750010454-1 4. Черненко Е.Ф. Африка в контексте структурных изменений на мировом энергетическом рынке. Азия и Африка сегодня. 2020. № 9. С. 52–57. https://doi.org/10.31857/S032150750010861-9 5. Шубин В.Г. (ред.). ЮАР сегодня. М.: Институт Африки РАН, 2020. 6. De Korte G.J. Processing low-grade coal to produce high-grade products. Scielo. 2015. Pp. 569–572. https://scielo.org.za/pdf/jsaimm/v115n7/04.pdf 7. Dirksen U. Irgendwann knallt’s. Südafrika. IPG-Journal. 2022. https://www.ipg-journal.de/rubriken/wirtschaft-und-oekologie/artikel/inflation-energiepreise-suedafrika-vietnam-ecuador-6157/ (accessed : 15.12.2025)
8. Dyantyi-Gwanya N., Giwa S.O, Ncanywa Th., Taziwa R.T. Exploring Economic Expansion of Green Hydrogen Production in South Africa. Sustainability. 2025. Vol. 17. № 3, 901. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17030901 9. Eberhard A. From State to Market and Back Again: South Africa’s Power Sector Reforms. Economic and Political Weekly. 2005. Vol. 40. № 50. Pp. 5309–5317. 10. Eberhard A., Naude R. The South African Renewable Energy Independent Power Producer Procurement Programme: A review and lessons learned. Journal of Energy in Southern Africa. 2016. Vol. 27. № 4. Cape Town. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2016/v27i4a1483 11. Jahns S. How Has the Current Electricity Crisis in South Africa Affected the Development of Renewable Energy within the Independent Power Producer Procurement Programmes? Lund University. Bachelor Thesis. 2023. https://lup.lub.lu.se/luur/download?func=downloadFile&recordOId=9121116&fileOId=9121130 (accessed: 15.12.2025) 12. Hendrickse R. Towards a South African developmental state: The Electricity Supply Commission (Eskom) – victor or villain in this endeavour? International Journal of research in business and social science. 2022. Vol. 11. № 9. Pp. 289–299. https://doi.org/10.20525/ijrbs.v11i9.2208 13. Heÿn H.M. Einflussmöglichkeiten von Oppositionsparteien im einparteiendominanten politischen System Südafrikas. An der eingereichte Dissertation zur … Grades Doktor der Philosophie. Freien Universität. Berlin, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.17169/refubium-5095 14. Lamidi K.O., Juta L.B. Assessing the Energy Crisis in South Africa: The Socio-Economic Implication and Challenges Ahead. E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences (EHASS). 2024. Vol. 5. № 4. Pp. 508–517. https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.20245412 15. Müller M. Load shedding as a result of failures at the political-technological interface. South African Journal of Science. 2023. Vol. 119. № 9/10. https://doi.org/10.17159/sajs.2023/16595 16. Nel E., Marais L. South Africa’s Sustainability Transition: The Case of the Mpumalanga Province and its Coal-dependent Communities. In: Halonen M., Albrecht М., Kuhmonen I. (Eds.). Rescaling Sustainability Transitions. Palgrave Macmillan, 2025. Pp. 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-69918-4 17. Netshiozwi E.E. Causes of Failure of the South African Solar Water Heating Programme and the Forgone Social Benefits. Review of Social Sciences. 2019. Vol. 4. № 1. Pp. 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/rss.v3i1.136 18. Patrick S.M., Shirinde J., Kgarosi K., Makinthisa T., Euripidou R., Munnik V. Just energy transition from coal in South Africa: A scoping review. Environmental Science and Policy. 2025. Vol. 167. 104044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2025.104044 19. Phiri A., Nyoni B. Clean versus dirty electricity generation and economic growth in South Africa: time–frequency study. Economic Change and Restructuring. 2023. Vol. 56. Pp. 2801–2824. https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10644-023-09520-w 20. Shikwambanaa L., Mhangarab P., Mbathac N. Trend analysis and first-time observations of sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide in South Africa using TROPOMI/Sentinel-5 P data. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation. 2020. Vol. 91. 102130. Pp. 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jag. 2020.102130 21. Uys M., Holtzhausen M. Factors that have an impact on the future of trade unions in South Africa. Journal of Contemporary Management. 2016. Vol. 13. Pp. 1137–1184. 22. Westhuizen Van der B.C. Impact of coal quality on equipment lifetime at coal-fired power stations. MEng Dissertation, University of Pretoria. Pretoria, 2019. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/79670 23. Williams M. Energy, Labour and Democracy in South Africa. In: Satgar V. (Еd.). The Climate Crisis. South African and Global Democratic Eco-Socialist Alternatives. Wits University Press, 2018. Pp. 231–251. 24. Wlokas H.L. What contribution does the installation of solar water heaters make towards the alleviation of energy poverty in South Africa? Journal of Energy in Southern Africa. 2011. Vol. 22. № 2. Pp. 27–39. https://doi.org/10.17159/2413-3051/2011/v22i2a3212
For citation:
Nesterova E.S. (2025). The RSA’s Opposition Parties’ Approaches to Solving the Energy Crisis: a Viable Alternative to the ANC? Journal of the Institute for African Studies. Vol. 11. № 4. Pp. 138–155. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2025-73-4-138-155
Для цитирования:
Нестерова Е.С. Подходы оппозиционных партий к разрешению энергетического кризиса в ЮАР: альтернатива АНК? Ученые записки Института Африки РАН. 2025. Т. 11. № 4. С. 138–155. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2025-73-4-138-155
