Naledi Pandor and the affirmation of South African anti-colonial foreign policy – JOURNAL OF THE INSTITUTE FOR AFRICAN STUDIES

Author:

Simura B.

Abstract:

A country’s foreign policy reflects its political orientation, with an assertive foreign policy demonstrating a country’s degree of sovereignty on matters of global reach. In post-colonial Africa, an assertive foreign policy informs on the extent to which it is moving away from the influence of its former colonial master and its level of development. The primary driver of foreign policy, guided by the head of state or government, is the Foreign Affairs Minister. A charismatic foreign affairs minister plays a key role in advancing a country’s interests. This was evident with Naledi Pandor of South Africa. This paper attempts to discuss the role played by Naledi Pandor as the South African Minister of International Relations and Cooperation between May 2019 and June 2024. The paper synthesizes N. Pandor’s tenure as Minister of Foreign Affairs, dividing it into three categories, namely sovereign assertion, ethical international relations, and regional pragmatism. The paper is based on qualitative analysis of relevant material, as well as observation of events and issues as they unfolded on both global news channels and credible social media platforms and accounts. The paper concluded that N. Pandor led the Department of International Relations and Cooperation in establishing an assertive foreign policy that was based in South Africa’s liberation struggle, ethos of human rights, and equality.

Keywords:

Southern Africa, South Africa Foreign Policy, Anti-colonial Foreign Policy, Naledi Pandor, Minister of Foreign Affairs, International Relations, African Relations

References:

1. Adelmann M. Quiet diplomacy: The reason behind Mbeki’s Zimbabwe policy. Africa Spectrum. 2004. Vol. 39. № 2. Pp. 249–276.
2. Alden C., Le Pere G. South Africa’s post-Apartheid foreign policy: From reconciliation to ambiguity? Review of African Political Economy. 2004. Vol. 31. № 100. Pp. 283–297. https://doi.org/10.1080/0305624042000 262293
3. Back H., Teorell J., Von Hagen-Jamar A., Quiroz Flores A. War, performance and the survival of foreign ministers. Foreign Policy Analysis. 2021. Vol. 17. № 2. Pp. 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/fpa/oraa024
4. Crichlow S. Psychological influences on the policy choices of secretaries of state and foreign ministers. Cooperation and Conflict: Journal of the Nordic International Studies Association. 2005. Vol. 40. № 2. Pp. 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1177/0010836705047583
5. Cussans C.F. Whiteness is not enough: South Africa and the 1922 responsible government referendum in Southern Rhodesia. Historical Research. 2024. Vol. 97. № 275. Pp. 147–166. https://doi.org/10.1093/ hisres/htad026
6. Frost M. Global Ethics: Anarchy, Freedom and International Relations. London: Routledge, 2009.
7. Habib A. South Africa’s foreign policy: Hegemonic aspirations, neo-liberal orientations and global transformations. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2009. Vol. 16. № 2. Pp. 143–159.

8. Hendricks C., Majozi N. South Africa’s international relations: A new dawn? Journal of Asian and African Studies. 2021. Vol. 56. № 1. Pp. 64–78. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021909620946851
9. Hocking B. What is the foreign ministry? In: Rana K.S., Kurbalija J. (Eds.). Foreign Ministries: Managing Diplomatic Networks and Optimizing Value. Malta: DiploFoundation, 2007. Pp. 3–19.
10. Landsberg C. South Africa’s foreign policy under Thabo Mbeki and Jacob Zuma. Inroads: The Canadian Journal of Opinion. 2011. № 29.
11. Mandela N. South Africa’s future foreign policy. Foreign Affairs. 1993. Vol. 72. № 5. Pp. 86–97. https://doi.org/ 10.2307/20045816
12. Mangwanya F.U. Strategies of redressing colonial land imbalances in Southern Africa: Lessons from Zimbabwe’s land reform programme. Doctoral Dissertation. Harare: University of Zimbabwe, 2020.
13. Marlow L. Foreign foreign policy makers. Master’s Dissertation. London: University of London, 2007.
14. Mlambo A.S. Zimbabwe is not a South African province: Historicising South Africa’s Zimbabwe policy since the 1960s. Historia. 2016. Vol. 61. № 1. Pp. 18–40
15. Oliver E., Oliver W.H. The colonisation of South Africa: A unique case. HTS Teologiese Studies/Theological Studies. 2017. Vol. 73. № 3. Pp. 1–8. https://doi.org/10.4102/hts.v73i3.4498
16. Selezneva N.V. Wolf warrior diplomacy – Foreign policy for internal use in China. Governance and Politics. 2022. Vol. 1. № 2. Pp. 44–58. https://doi.org/10.24833/2782-7062-2022-1-2-44-58
17. Sidiropoulos E. South African foreign policy in the post-Mbeki period. South African Journal of International Affairs. 2008. Vol. 15. № 2. Pp. 107–120. https://doi.org/10.1080/10220460802636158
18. Simura B. Military intervention and international law: a critical analysis of the role of the international community in political uprisings in Libya and Syria. Doctoral dissertation. Durban: University of KwaZulu-Natal, 2014.
19. Singh A. Media perceptions and academic responses to South African President Thabo Mbeki. Journal of Social Science. 2006. Vol. 13. № 3. Pp. 163–176
20. Suttner R. Parliament’s role in foreign policy. Indicator SA. 1995. Vol. 12. № 3. Pp. 74–78.

For citation:

Simura B. (2026). Naledi Pandor and the affirmation of South African anti-colonial foreign policy. Journal of the Institute for African Studies. Vol. 12. № 1. Pp. 36–52. https://doi.org/10.31132/2412-5717-2026-74-1-36-52

Full Text Article (ENG )

Полный текст статьи (RUS)