Democracy Adrift and the Trajectories of the Political Parties in São Tomé and Príncipe
Author:
Augusto Nascimento
Abstract:
Since 1990, within the framework of the representative democracy then endorsed in São Tomé and Príncipe, there has been open political competition between political parties. Representative democracy and parties are not realities averse to the prevailing cultural patterns on the islands. However, this does not mean that parties have a role consistent with the idealization, common among São Toméans, about what they should represent and do in a representative democracy. For example, the governance programs or even the number of militants are not always known. Nor do party programs, when made explicit, clearly distinguish the various parties.
Despite the openness to the creation of new parties, mainly presidential initiatives, the party landscape has been characterized by opposition between the two largest parties, the Movement for the Liberation of São Tomé and Príncipe, the historic independence party, and Independent Democratic Action , which in recent years has asserted itself as the dominant party.
In this text, in addition to the summary characterization of the functioning and performance of the parties – sometimes, one-man parties –, an attempt is also made to characterize the free and open political competition in which the parties have moved from 1990 to the present day. Factors undermining democracy are highlighted, for example, the growing political and social entropy, discouragement and the feeling of loss of determination of individual and collective futures, and even temptations of authoritarian drifts. Strictly speaking, perhaps more than the erosion of democracy, we are witnessing the decantation of disbelief in the country, which contaminates all political action.
Some politicians point out the need for changes in the parties, even for them to have a fruitful action, if not to achieve development, at least to contain impoverishment and greater social fissures. However, the hypothesis that parties will continue to replicate the practices and vices that lead to the gap between parties and society is more plausible, not to say accurate. Incidentally, the recent political history of the island highlights a set of purposes and actions, guided by acrimony and violence, averse to a minimum cohesion, which is why it is difficult to believe in overcoming the obstacles set for the pacification of political and social competition.
Keywords:
Sao Tome and Principe, democracy, political parties
DOI:
10.31132/2412-5717-2023-63-2-82-100
References:
1. Anuário Estatístico 1973, 1973, S. Tomé, Instituto Nacional de Estatística. Delegação de S. Tomé e Príncipe.
2. Branco, Rafael e Varela, Afonso, 1998, Os caminhos da democracia, Amadora.
3. Ceita, João Guadalupe Viegas de, 2012, O Memórias e sonhos perdidos de um combatente pela libertação e progresso de São Tomé e Príncipe, s. l., s. ed.
4. Chabal, Patrick, 1993, “O Estado pós-colonial na África de expressão portuguesa” in Soronda. Revista de Estudos Guineenses No. 15, Bissau, INEP, pp.37‒55.
5. Chabal, Patrick e Daloz, Jean-Pascal, 1999, Africa works. Disorder as political instrument, Oxford, James Currey.
6. Couto, Amaro Pereira do, 1997, O processo democrático, volume 1, São Tomé, Colecções Ponta d’Acha.
7. Gonzalez, David, 2000, “Who leads to where? African leadership into 21st Century” in Othamn, Haroub (ed.), Reflections on leadership in Africa forty years after independence, Dar-es-Salam, VUB University Press, pp.131‒158.
8. Falola, Toyin, 2004, [1ª ed. 2001] Nationalism and African intellectuals, University of Rochester Press, Rochester.
9. Fleischhacker, Helga, 1999, “São Tomé and Príncipe” in Nolhen, Dieter, Krennerich, Michael e Thibaut, Bernhard, Elections in África. A data handbook, Oxford, Oxford University Press, pp.739‒754.
10. Frynas, Jedrzej George, Wood, Geoffrey e Oliveira, Ricardo M. S. Soares de, 2003, “Business and politics in São Tomé e Príncipe: from cocoa monoculture to petro-state” in African Affairs 102, Royal African Society, pp.51‒80.
11. Lavroff, Dmitri, 1975, Os partidos políticos da África Negra, Amadora, Bertrand.
12. Mbembe, Achille, 2013, África insubmissa. Cristianismo, poder e estado na sociedade pós-colonial, Mangualde, Edições Pedago.
13. Meng, Anne, 2020, Constraining dictatorship. From personalized rule to institutionalized regimes, Cambridge University Press.
14. Nascimento, Augusto, 2010, “São Tomé e Príncipe na idade adulta: a governação e o descaso da rua” in Tempo do Mundo, vol. 2, No. 3, IPEA, Brasília, pp.45‒73, in http://www.ipea.gov.br/ portal/images/stories/PDFs/111024_rtm_portugues03.pdf, accessed: 27 January 2014.
15. Nascimento, Augusto, 2011, “São Tomé e Príncipe: a independência ou o parto do autoritarismo” in Rollemberg, Denise e Quadrat, Samantha Viz (orgs.), A construção social dos regimes autoritários. Legitimidade, consenso e consentimento no século XX. África e Ásia, Rio de Janeiro, Civilização Brasileira, pp.157‒205.
16. _____ 2013a, “As pulsões na política em São Tomé e Príncipe” in Africana Studia No. 20, Porto, CEAUP, pp.135‒152.
17. _____ 2013b, “Os dividendos do autoritarismo colonial: o impacto e a manipulação do legado colonial na configuração do pós-independência em São Tomé e Príncipe” in Pimentel, Irene e Rezola, Maria Inácia (orgs.), 2013, Democracia, ditadura. Memória e justiça política, Lisbon, Tinta-da-China, pp.259‒282.
18. _____ 2018a, “São Tomé e Príncipe: recordar os mortos e… que dizer dos vivos?” http://blog.cei.iscte-iul.pt/sao-tome-e-principe-recordar-os-mortos-e-que-dizer-dos-vivos/, accessed: 26 January 2018.
19. _____ 2018b, “A abrasiva situação política em São Tomé e Príncipe: por quem os sinos dobram?” in http://blog.cei.iscte-iul.pt/a-abrasiva-situacao-politica-em-sao-tome-e-principe-por-quem-os-sinos-dobram/, accessed: 11 May 2018.
20. _____ 2019, São Tomé e Príncipe. As tramas da política e a emancipação do saber histórico, São Tomé, BISTP.
21. _____ 2021, “Eleições presidenciais em São Tomé e Príncipe: especulações e coloquialidade à medida” in Eleições presidenciais em São Tomé e Príncipe: especulações e coloquialidade à medida (africanos.eu), published on 23 July 2021 accessed: 23 July 2021.
22. _____, 2022, “Eleições em São Tomé e Príncipe em 2022: o povo tira, o povo põe… até quando?” in Luz do Pensamento No. 31, 13 October 2022, pp.2‒3.
23. Sanches, Edalina Rodrigues, 2015, “O desenvolvimento dos sistemas partidários de Cabo Verde e São Tomé e Príncipe em perspetiva comparada (1991-2014)”, Anuário de direito de São Tomé e Príncipe, Instituto do Direito de Língua Portuguesa, pp.121‒145, in http://repositorio.ul.pt/ bitstream/10451/25347/3/ICS_ERSanches_Desenvolvimento_ARN.pdf, accessed: 22 June 2019.
24. Santo, Armindo Ceita Espírito, 2008, Economia de S. Tomé e Príncipe entre o regime do partido único e o multipartidarismo, Lisbon, Edições Colibri.
25. Santos, Carlos Oliveira, 2014, Patrice Trovoada. Uma voz africana, Lisbon, Âncora Editora.
26. Seibert, Gerhard, 1995, “A política num micro-estado. São Tomé e Príncipe, ou os conflitos pessoais e políticos na génese dos partidos políticos” in Lusotopie, Paris, Karthala, pp.239‒250.
27. _____, 2002, Camaradas, clientes e compadres. Colonialismo, socialismo e democratização em São Tomé e Príncipe, Lisbon, Vega.